Skip to content
office buildings
office buildings

Voting rights in German companies

How to comply with BaFin's notification requirements and avoid fines

If you hold voting rights or equivalent instruments in German companies, you need to be aware of the notification regime that applies to changes in your holdings. Failing to notify the issuer and the German Federal Financial Authority (BaFin) of reaching, exceeding or falling below certain thresholds can result in hefty fines, often reaching seven figure sums, suspension of voting rights, publication of the breach and damage claims.

In this article, we explain the legal background, the notification triggers, the sanctions and the mitigation strategies for breaches of the German voting rights disclosure obligations.

 

Legal background

The German voting rights disclosure obligations aim to ensure transparency and efficiency in the financial markets and to reduce information asymmetries among investors.

Read more Legal background
Read more Legal background

legal icon

When is the notification obligation triggered?

Any natural person or legal entity that holds voting rights or equivalent instruments in German companies is required to notify both the issuer and BaFin of any changes in their holdings that reach, exceed or fall below the following thresholds: 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% or 75% of the total voting rights of the issuer. The notification must be made without undue delay, which means at the latest within four trading days after the change occurs.

These notification rules are, however, far from straightforward and in many cases render the question whether a notification is required extremely complex.

What are equivalent instruments to voting rights?

The German voting rights disclosure obligations do not only cover voting rights as such, but also instruments that are regarded as equivalent to voting rights. These are instruments that give the holder the right or the possibility to acquire, sell or exercise voting rights, or that have a similar economic effect. The qualification of an instrument as equivalent to voting rights depends on the specific circumstances and often raises uncertainties.

Some examples of instruments that may be equivalent to voting rights are:

  • Forward transactions, futures and call-options
  • Repurchase agreements and security lending trades
  • Letters of intent or irrevocables
  • Sales contracts that are subject to are condition precedent
  • Baskets and indices
  • Capital increases or capital reductions by the issuer or the restructuring of the share capital
  • Revival of voting rights attached to preferred shares
  • Voting rights attributed to another entity: Such attribution may trigger notification requirements without the concerned party itself holding any shares or voting rights, for example voting rights held by a subsidiary or shares transferred by way of security
  • ‘Acting in concert’: The voting rights of otherwise unrelated parties may be aggregated when the parties willingly act in concert.

Consequences of a breach

Many companies miss the notification requirements for voting rights in Germany, which have very short deadlines and unclear legal rules. They may forget to notify, send wrong, incomplete or late information, or not follow the correct format.

Read more Consequences of a breach
Read more Consequences of a breach

Dollar icon

What are the sanctions for breaching the German voting rights disclosure obligations?

Breaching the German voting rights disclosure obligations can have serious consequences for the holder of the voting rights or equivalent instruments. BaFin can impose the following sanctions:

  • A fine of up to EUR 10 million or 5% of the total annual turnover or twice the amount of the economic benefit derived from the breach, whichever is higher
  • A suspension of the voting rights for up to six months
  • A publication of the breach on BaFin’s website
  • A damage claim by the issuer or other shareholders

For example, in August 2022, it fined Bank of America Corporation EUR 5,100,000 for late voting rights notifications. In July 2021, it fined JPMorgan Chase Bank EUR 1,830,000 for the same reason.

How does BaFin proceed in case of a breach?

1. BaFin investigates the breach

BaFin has the authority and the tools to investigate any potential breach of the law on its own. It can use similar methods as the public prosecution in a criminal case. Sometimes, it also works with the police or local authorities to help with the investigation.

2. BaFin informs you of the procedure

While BaFin is not obliged to notify you, it often does so at an early stage of the procedure in order to let that party – often unaware that they may be in breach – know of the notification requirement and potential breach. By contrast, BaFin is under an obligation to hear the affected person.

3. BaFin sets the fine

After the hearing and the evaluation of the breach, BaFin decides how much to fine you. The amount of a BaFin fine depends on the severity of the breach and various other factors. BaFin has a lot of discretion in setting the fine, influenced by EU law. It can impose one of three maximum fines for legal persons under German law, and it usually chooses the highest one.

BaFin follows a three-step process to determine the fine amount, based on the case details and the criteria related to the offence, offender, and the affected party. These are:

(1) calculating a base amount,

(2) adjusting the base amount for the specific guilt of the affected party,

(3) considering the financial situation of the affected party.

However, the criteria that BaFin uses to set a fine are not very clear, even with existing Guidelines. This makes it hard to estimate the size of fines.

How can I mitigate the fine?

If you want to avoid a long and costly administrative fine proceeding, you should consider negotiating a settlement with BaFin. This strategy can help you save time and money, as well as secure a favourable outcome. Settlements can also lower the fine significantly.

Read more How can I mitigate the fine?
Read more How can I mitigate the fine?

umbrella icon

How can the fine be reduced?

If a breach of the German voting rights disclosure obligations is detected, it is advisable to act swiftly and cooperate with BaFin to reduce the fine. BaFin may take into account the following factors when determining the amount of the fine:

  • The intention or negligence of the breach
  • The promptness of the remedy
  • The impact of the breach on the market
  • The measures taken to prevent future breaches

If you need assistance with the German voting rights disclosure obligations, please contact our experienced team of lawyers who can advise you on the notification requirements, the qualification of instruments, the calculation of thresholds, the notification forms and the communication with BaFin. We can also help you with the defence and mitigation of any sanctions that may arise from a breach.

More information on the settlement procedure can be found here.

legal icon

When is the notification obligation triggered?

Any natural person or legal entity that holds voting rights or equivalent instruments in German companies is required to notify both the issuer and BaFin of any changes in their holdings that reach, exceed or fall below the following thresholds: 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% or 75% of the total voting rights of the issuer. The notification must be made without undue delay, which means at the latest within four trading days after the change occurs.

These notification rules are, however, far from straightforward and in many cases render the question whether a notification is required extremely complex.

What are equivalent instruments to voting rights?

The German voting rights disclosure obligations do not only cover voting rights as such, but also instruments that are regarded as equivalent to voting rights. These are instruments that give the holder the right or the possibility to acquire, sell or exercise voting rights, or that have a similar economic effect. The qualification of an instrument as equivalent to voting rights depends on the specific circumstances and often raises uncertainties.

Some examples of instruments that may be equivalent to voting rights are:

  • Forward transactions, futures and call-options
  • Repurchase agreements and security lending trades
  • Letters of intent or irrevocables
  • Sales contracts that are subject to are condition precedent
  • Baskets and indices
  • Capital increases or capital reductions by the issuer or the restructuring of the share capital
  • Revival of voting rights attached to preferred shares
  • Voting rights attributed to another entity: Such attribution may trigger notification requirements without the concerned party itself holding any shares or voting rights, for example voting rights held by a subsidiary or shares transferred by way of security
  • ‘Acting in concert’: The voting rights of otherwise unrelated parties may be aggregated when the parties willingly act in concert.

Dollar icon

What are the sanctions for breaching the German voting rights disclosure obligations?

Breaching the German voting rights disclosure obligations can have serious consequences for the holder of the voting rights or equivalent instruments. BaFin can impose the following sanctions:

  • A fine of up to EUR 10 million or 5% of the total annual turnover or twice the amount of the economic benefit derived from the breach, whichever is higher
  • A suspension of the voting rights for up to six months
  • A publication of the breach on BaFin’s website
  • A damage claim by the issuer or other shareholders

For example, in August 2022, it fined Bank of America Corporation EUR 5,100,000 for late voting rights notifications. In July 2021, it fined JPMorgan Chase Bank EUR 1,830,000 for the same reason.

How does BaFin proceed in case of a breach?

1. BaFin investigates the breach

BaFin has the authority and the tools to investigate any potential breach of the law on its own. It can use similar methods as the public prosecution in a criminal case. Sometimes, it also works with the police or local authorities to help with the investigation.

2. BaFin informs you of the procedure

While BaFin is not obliged to notify you, it often does so at an early stage of the procedure in order to let that party – often unaware that they may be in breach – know of the notification requirement and potential breach. By contrast, BaFin is under an obligation to hear the affected person.

3. BaFin sets the fine

After the hearing and the evaluation of the breach, BaFin decides how much to fine you. The amount of a BaFin fine depends on the severity of the breach and various other factors. BaFin has a lot of discretion in setting the fine, influenced by EU law. It can impose one of three maximum fines for legal persons under German law, and it usually chooses the highest one.

BaFin follows a three-step process to determine the fine amount, based on the case details and the criteria related to the offence, offender, and the affected party. These are:

(1) calculating a base amount,

(2) adjusting the base amount for the specific guilt of the affected party,

(3) considering the financial situation of the affected party.

However, the criteria that BaFin uses to set a fine are not very clear, even with existing Guidelines. This makes it hard to estimate the size of fines.

umbrella icon

How can the fine be reduced?

If a breach of the German voting rights disclosure obligations is detected, it is advisable to act swiftly and cooperate with BaFin to reduce the fine. BaFin may take into account the following factors when determining the amount of the fine:

  • The intention or negligence of the breach
  • The promptness of the remedy
  • The impact of the breach on the market
  • The measures taken to prevent future breaches

If you need assistance with the German voting rights disclosure obligations, please contact our experienced team of lawyers who can advise you on the notification requirements, the qualification of instruments, the calculation of thresholds, the notification forms and the communication with BaFin. We can also help you with the defence and mitigation of any sanctions that may arise from a breach.

More information on the settlement procedure can be found here.

The following calculator is intended to give you an idea of the scale for a fine resulting of a particular breach of notification requirements.

Please note that BaFin has a wide discretion when determining the fine and the final amount of the fine will depend on the particular circumstances that might mitigate or aggravate the breach of notification requirements.

Our Rulefinder Shareholding Disclosure service provides in-depth analysis of major shareholding rules in 100+ jurisdictions. Learn more and request a free trial.

Q&A

Is it better to keep quiet about a breach of the notification duties that you have noticed or to come forward with it afterwards?

Is it better to keep quiet about a breach of the notification duties that you have noticed or to come forward with it afterwards?

We recommend you to come forward with a breach as quickly as possible. The length of the delay is among the main factors determining the severity of the offence – and hence the size of the fine. Additionally, a confession can significantly reduce the fine. However, the quality of the confession is decisive, as only a voluntary self-incrimination by the concerned party is treated as a confession. That is the case if BaFin would not have become aware of the offense without the cooperation of the party concerned.
Does a breach of notification duties prescribe?

Does a breach of notification duties prescribe?

Breaches of the notification requirements become statute-barred after three years under German law. This three year-period only begins once the notification has been made up for, or once the BaFin becomes aware of the breach.
How long does an administrative fine procedure typically last?

How long does an administrative fine procedure typically last?

The BaFin does not publish any data on the duration of its proceedings. Experience has shown such proceedings to take between weeks and years, depending – among other factors – on the complexity of the case. However, a settlement can significantly reduce the duration as investigative measures can become unnecessary. Not least because a shortening and simplification of the otherwise very formalized procedure is also in the interest of the BaFin, settlements have become the dominant outcome of fine proceedings.
What costs do I have to expect during the fine proceedings?

What costs do I have to expect during the fine proceedings?

Fine proceedings are typically relatively resource-intensive and time-consuming, while the exact effort highly depends on the circumstances of the individual case. However, the affected party is also able to reduce efforts (and costs), most importantly by making use of the settlement procedure and by cooperating with BaFin’s investigation.
Can my breach and the corresponding sanction be published?

Can my breach and the corresponding sanction be published?

Yes. Under the notion of “naming and shaming”, German law stipulates that BaFin must publish decisions on measures and penalties imposed due to infringements of (among others) notification requirements. Aside from the infringement itself, BaFin must state the natural or legal person responsible for the infringement. In certain cases however, BaFin shall refrain from publishing any personal data or the decision as a whole. Most importantly, that is the case if the publication would be disproportionate or would cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved. Under regular circumstances, the decision is published without delay on BaFin’s website. There you can find recent publications of imposed fines.
Do I have to expect further consequences after the conclusion of a fine procedure (e.g. stricter sanctions in future fine procedure)?

Do I have to expect further consequences after the conclusion of a fine procedure (e.g. stricter sanctions in future fine procedure)?

First, an imposed fine will influence future sanctions to the extent that the future breach will then count as a repeat offence. That is regularly the case when the future offense is factually and temporally related the past offense. A repeat offense constitutes an aggravating adjustment criterion that increases size of the fine. Second, a concluded fine by BaFin and its corresponding publication might also increase the risk of subsequent civil law claims by shareholders of the issuer that have suffered damage as a result of the omitted notification. Technically, there is also a risk that the issuer itself may reclaim dividends. However, issuers appear to rarely pursue this.