- Home
- Blogs
French Constitutional Council censors National Assembly’s ‘historic’ amendment on transparency
Browse this blog post
Related news and insights
Blog Post: 29 March 2023
Drug shortages: Belgian Royal Decree adopted which sets conditions for export authorisation
Blog Post: 08 March 2023
Blog Post: 28 November 2022
Blog Post: 27 October 2022
Non-binding opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal issued in the G 2/21 referral on "plausibility"
Accordingly, the amendments requiring pharmaceutical companies to publicly disclose any public R&D contributions they have received during the development of a medicinal product, that should be taken into consideration when negotiating the price of the medicinal product with the relevant pharmaceutical companies, were removed from the law.
In its decision, the French Constitutional Council ruled that such amendment was introduced in a new reading in the National Assembly and was not, at this stage of the procedure, directly related to a provision still under discussion, nor was it intended to: (i) ensure compliance with the Constitution; (ii) coordinate with texts under consideration; or (iii) correct a material error. The Council concluded that the amendment was adopted according to a procedure that was contrary to the Constitution, therefore contrary to the Constitution itself and should be censored.
Following the decision, the 2020 Social Security Financing Law was enacted without such provisions.
This article was co-authored by Alexis Vaujany.
A prior version of this post was originally published by the same authors in Practical Law – Life Sciences, February 2020 Issue (Thomson Reuters).