Skip to content

Andrew Rhys Davies

Partner

New York

Davies Andrew Rhys
Andrew Rhys Davies

Partner

New York

Andrew assists clients with their U.S. litigation and regulatory challenges, focusing on securities, antitrust, and financial services, and on cross-border matters involving jurisdictional and comity issues. In 2016-2017, Andrew served as Assistant Solicitor General for the State of New York, representing the State and its agencies in appellate litigation.

In public service and in private practice, Andrew has handled dozens of appeals in federal and state courts, involving, among other issues:

  • Novel jurisdictional, extraterritoriality, and international-comity issues, see, e.g., Gucci America, Inc. v. Weixing Li, 768 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2014); Matter of Child A., 145 A.D.3d 874 (2d Dep't 2016), lv. denied, 29 N.Y.3d 906 (2017); Tire Eng'g & Distribution L.L.C. v. Bank of China Ltd., 740 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2014).
  • Regulatory-enforcement actions, see, e.g., New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation v. Segreto, 169 A.D.3d 813 (2d Dep’t 2019); Kernan v. New York State Dep’t of Fin. Servs., 712 Fed. Appx. 61 (2d Cir. 2017); Matter of Donn Gerelli Associates Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Lawsky, 52 N.Y.S.3d 862 (1st Dep’t 2017); SEC v. Goldman Sachs & Co., 790 F. Supp. 2d 147 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).
  • Legal challenges based on constitutional, pre-emption, and statutory arguments, see, e.g., Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. Presiding Justices of the Appellate Divisions, 852 F.3d 178 (2d Cir. 2017); Figueroa v. Foster, 864 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2017); Matter of Melrose Credit Union, 161 A.D.3d 742 (2d Dep’t 2018); Retail Energy Supply Ass'n v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of State, 152 A.D.3d 1133 (3d Dep’t 2017); State v. Keith F., 149 A.D.3d 671 (1st Dep’t 2017).
  • Tort and other claims brought against global businesses, see, e.g., In re Herald, 730 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 2013), reh’g denied, 753 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2014), cert. denied sub nom. Trezziova v. Kohn, 135 S.Ct. 1701 (2015); Deirmenjian v. Deutsche Bank AG, 548 F. App’x 461 (9th Cir. 2013).

Among his current matters, Andrew is representing Samsung SDI in a long-running antitrust litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Litig., No. 4:07-cv-5944-JST (N.D. Cal.), and Refinitiv in a lawsuit pending in New York State Supreme Court to enjoin termination of a middleware license agreement. Andrew is also heavily engaged in the firm's work to help clients plan for and manage the risks presented by the transition from IBORs to risk-free interest rates.

In addition to his trial and appellate litigation docket, Andrew has represented corporate and individual clients in federal and state regulatory investigations, including before the Department of Justice, SEC, and various state attorneys general.

Andrew is a member of the Second Circuit’s Pro Bono Panel.

News & insights

Landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling to support LGBTQ+ employment rights

Publications: 10 DECEMBER 2020

Landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling to support LGBTQ+ employment rights

In June this year, the United States Supreme Court made a historic decision in support of the LGBTQ+ community, ruling that discrimination against workers based on their sexual orientation or…

Read more
Virtual hearings are here to stay

Publications: 10 DECEMBER 2020

Love them or hate them: Virtual hearings are here to stay

Commercial dispute resolution has undergone a forced revolution during 2020, with courts and arbitral tribunals in many major jurisdictions responding to social restrictions put in place to control…

Read more
Legal agility and risk resilience: How to enhance your organisation’s readiness to withstand the next crisis

Publications: 26 OCTOBER 2020

Legal agility and risk resilience: How to enhance your organisation’s readiness to withstand the next crisis

What can in-house legal, risk and compliance leaders learn from the Covid-19 pandemic and other notable crises of the past 20 years to strengthen the legal resilience of their organisations?

Read more
LCD stock exchange screen showing the words index and close

Publications: 07 OCTOBER 2020

Covid-19 threatens surge in M&A disputes

The pandemic has led to a sharp up-tick in disputes between buyers and sellers, with the prospect of litigation and arbitration on aspects of the deal process that have rarely been tested before.

Read more

Office

New York

Allen & Overy LLP
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York
NY 10020

View office →

Qualifications

Professional

Admitted as a Solicitor, England & Wales 1999

Admitted: Bar of the State of New York 2002

Admitted: United States District Courts 
Southern District of New York 2002 
Eastern District of New York 2002

Admitted: United States Courts of Appeals, 
Second Circuit 2006 
Ninth Circuit 2007 
Fifth Circuit 2016 
Eleventh Circuit 2020

Admitted: Supreme Court of the United States 2008

Admitted: United States Court of Federal Claims 2011

Academic

Cambridge University, Churchill College, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Bachelor of Arts (Law), First Class (1995)
Honors: John Hall Prize for Family Law (1995)
David Gottlieb Prize - awarded for best overall performance (1994)
Clive Parry Prize for International Law (1994)
C.J. Hamson Prize for Contract (1994)

College of Law, York, United Kingdom
Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice, High Distinction, 1996

Published work

  • “Commercial Litigation: International Series,” Section of United States (pp. 519-528), Thomson Reuters, Second Edition, September 2015, (Justin L. Ormand, co-author)