Public Law

• Time limits for damages claims based on public law breaches during rail franchise procurement: Secretary of State for Transport v Arriva Rail East Ltd & ors [2019] EWCA Civ 2259 (February 2020)
• Disclosure to non-party ngo of evidence relied on at court British American Tobacco (UK) Ltd & ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2018] (Mar 2019)
• Decisions of a private body acting as ‘Skilled Person’ cannot be judicially reviewed R (Holmcroft Properties Ltd) v KPMG LLP & ors [2018](Nov 2018)
• When to challenge public contract awards – lessons learned from the UK passport saga (May 2018)
• Limited waiver, inadvertent waiver and “cherry picking” (May 2018)
• An unusual order for alternative service (March 2018)
• The inviolability of diplomatic mission documents (March 2018)
• Refusal of judicial review of sale of Green Investment Bank R (SDC LLP) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (May 2017)
• Breach of public procurement rules – damages and timing of challenge Nuclear Decommissioning Authority v Energy Solutions EU Ltd (May 2017

Contract

• Standard of reasonableness in contract with public body: Wednesbury not applied: David Krebs v NHS Commissioning Board (As successor body to Salford Primary CareTrust) (Jan 2015)

Privilege

• Training slides can attract legal professional privilege: Ministry of Justice v The Information Commissioner & Joanna Shaw (June 2016)

Public procurement

• Successful procurement challenge and witness success bonuses Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (Aug/Sept 2016)
• Procurement challenge to rail franchise tender process fails: R (on the application of London Borough of Enfield) v Secretary of State for Transport (June 2016)
• Public procurement: automatic suspensions to the award of contracts: Bristol Missing Link Ltd v Bristol City Council (May 2015)
• Review of authority's decision to cancel tender process: Croce Amica One Italia Srl v Azienda Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (Jan 2015)

State aid

• Court of Appeal upholds application of the private investor principle in State aid: R (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council (June 2016)
• State aid recovery rates ordered against Irish airlines: Case T-473/12 Aer Lingus Ltd v Commission and Case T-500/12 Ryanair Ltd v Commission (April 2015)
• Application of the private investor principle in state aid: R (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) & ors v Coventry City Council & ors (Aug/Sep 2014)